Unit 4; Theme questions

Belinda: 

To my fellow students and facilitator

 

This week I wish to share with you an article that appeared in the Globe & Mail, a newspaper that is considered by many to be Canada’s national newspaper.  I think the content connects with theme question #1 concerning the profound changes that our world underwent throughout the last century.  My husband has tried to locate this article on the Globe & Mail website  and been unable to do.  It may not be there because of copyright reasons.  I suggest anyone who wants to find more about this try Google.  The article is actually an edited excerpt from the foreword written by TomWolfe  to a book called Understanding Me: Lectures and Interviews of Marshall McLuhan, edited by Stephanie McLuhan and David Staines and published by McClelland & Stewart.

I will now recount the content that I found most interesting.

 

Marshall Mcluhan, a Canadian born in 1911, attended Cambridge, converted to Roman Catholicism and became a professor of English at St Michael’s college at the University of Toronto, emerged in the 1960’s as a major communication theorist when he published his book Understanding Media.  In this and other works he theorized that print enhanced the visual sense at the expense of other senses which led to much specialization (which proved productive in may ways) and also to fragmentation of human experience and activity.  Thus we have bureaucracy, science, modern armies, nationalistic wars and other things such such as fragmentation of society by age and pornography which is the separation of sex from love, etc.  In mid-century T.V. burst upon the Western world and is now found virtually everywhere.  McLuhan thought this medium would reverse this process restoring a kind of “preliterate” sensory balance with the auditory and tactile senses.  He called T.V. an “audio-tactile” medium.  To him T.V. and other electronic media would eventually spread itself as a “seamless web” over the world.  McLuhan believed this medium would force a profound change in education and that this would bring about a “Total Change” (his capitals).  Just as the axe is an extension of the human arm and the wheel an extension of the human foot, the electronic media would be an extension of the human central nervous system and that these nervous systems would be brought together irresistibly and human nature would be different.  Nationalism would be impossible and people would be “irrevocably involved with and responsible for” one another.  Racial groups would no longer be insulated from each other.  We would be living in the “global village”.  He did not assume this “global village” would necessarily be an utopia as it could just as easily be a slaughterhouse but the possibility for an advance is definitely there.  Actually McLuhan believed that this new age contained  possibility of something quite sublime.  Here is where his Catholicism comes in for he the notion of all men as members of the “body of Christ” as being a technological possibility.

 

In this respect, McLuhan expressed the influence of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, geologist and paleontologist, who had become a Jesuit priest at age 30 in 1911.  He had taken up as his life’s mission to take Darwin’s elucidation  of the processes of evolution and reconcile it with Christian belief by showing how this physical evolution was but the first part of God’s grand design for the evolution of man.  Teilhard believed that right now in the 20th Century God was directing the evolution of man into a ”noosphere”, a term he coined to describe a more spiritual state of mankind and the unification of all which he believed was made possible through technology.  He talked of the development of communications that would weave us all together.  He thought that our time was when the age of civilizations is ending and the age of “one civilization” (his underlining) is beginning.

 

The writer of this “foreword” comments on the amazingly accurate prediction of both these scholars of the system we have today.  And here we are, my friends, working with that very system of  planet-embracing communication predicted by them and by Shoghi Effendi even earlier.  See the World Order Of Baha’u’llah, p. 203.  “A mechanism of world inter-communication will be devised, embracing the whole planet, freed from national hindrances and restrictions, and functioning with marvelous swiftness and perfect regularity.”  This was written by Shoghi Effendi in 1936!

 

I am impressed by exactness of the vision of both Teilhard de Chardin and McLuhan and their complete unawareness of its origin.  Nevertheless they both help push humanity forward.

 

Return